A friendly bunch of ageing soft lads who play games to unwind
https://www.22ndsas.info/forums/
Codemasters was [sh*t] in the 80s, not a patch on Ultimate Play The Gameumbongo(uk) wrote:dont you go picking on codemasters they single handidly kept me zx spectrum entertained during the 80,s and for that ill let them off a few mistakes
It's got nothing to do with drinking in pubs since you were 13 then?umbongo(uk) wrote:ok i wont let them off .as thats the reason im now a pauper and ill educated.bloody computer games are the devils work . ban them all
DL'd my first porn in the 80's, pre-internet off a BBS called The Medway SanitoriumPorky wrote:but still with mw2 they made 1 billion in 2 months on console kidies and pc sellouts....so welcome to the future of pc gaming
bongo sad [tw*t]....every1 knows the hoff and his girls was the best entertainment of the 80's.....that a duran durans girls on film anyways
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IuYrRebvFHc&feature=fvst
and enjoy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlyPVfT5uoo
256 colour gifs 
Activision court battle means no DLC for MW2
In what is now fast becoming the gaming industry scandal of the decade it may be the consumer that ends up bearing the brunt of Activision’s and Infinity Wards legal proceedings. Only this morning IGN have published the full detail of the lawsuit that is being filed against Activision by Jason West and Vince Zampella. In it the Plaintiff (West and Zampella) claim ownership of the Modern Warfare brand and have requested a temporary or permanent injunction against the release of any Modern Warfare game, or Call of Duty title set in the post-Vietnam era, near future or distant future.
Now this may not at first glance appear to have any bearing on any future content for the current Modern Warfare 2 title, however further on in the document the plaintiffs request for relief further outlines that they contest the exploitation of the Modern Warfare brand stating
For a preliminary or permanent injunction against’s Defendant enjoining it and its officers, agents, employees and representatives from violating Plaintiff’s rights with respect to the development, release and exploitation of any Modern Warfare game or Call of Duty title set in the post-Vietnam era, near future or distant future.
The key word here is of course exploitation which will include gaining financial reward. So with the whole brand in question and an injunction being sought by the Plainiff then the possibility of seeing any extra content for Modern Warfare 2 at all never mind any time soon is very slim
source